Beyond tumor response,ROMVIMZA delivered significant improvement
in range of motion (ROM) vs placebo1,2
Almost5XGreater
improvementin active ROM vs placebo at 6 months1,2
ROM improved 18.4% with ROMVIMZA vs 3.8% with placebo
(95% CI: 4.0, 25.3; P=0.0077)1,2
Patients taking ROMVIMZA had a mean ROM of 63.0% at the start of the study and experienced an improvement to 83.6% at 6 months1,2
Patients taking placebo had a mean ROM of 62.9% at the start of the study and experienced an improvement to 68.3% at 6 months1,2
Tumor locations included in the ROM analysis included the knee (67%), ankle (12%), hip (10%), other (5%), foot (3.3%), and wrist (2.4%)1
Using the knee as an example, a total ROM of 83.6% falls within the goal range after a total knee arthroplasty and the range required for typical daily activities including2-4:
- Tying
shoes - Getting in and
out of a chair - Walking up or
down stairs - Walking on
level ground
How ROM was measured and defined2,4,5
ROM was assessed by goniometry and expressed as mean percentage change from baseline relative to a reference standard for the affected joint
Total ROM is the total possible movement for a specific joint, eg, total ROM of a knee is 135°
CI=confidence interval; ROM=range of motion.
ROMVIMZA significantly improved
certain TGCT symptoms1,5
Patients on ROMVIMZA showed
Clinically meaningful and statistically significant
improvement in function1,2,5
Improvements for some patients were seen at first assessment (week 5)5
Change from baseline at week 25 in PROMIS‑PF was a prespecified key secondary endpoint in the MOTION study1,2,5
PROMIS‑PF measures a patient's ability to do a range of daily activities
15‑item questionnaire assessed tumor location‑specific (upper vs lower extremity) physical function
Data for PROMIS‑PF is largely based on lower limb extremity assessment due to tumor location. Higher scores of PROMIS‑PF indicate better physical functioning
*MCID responder: ≥3 point increase from baseline in PROMIS‑PF score at week 25.2,5
CI=confidence interval; LS=least squares; MCID=minimum clinically important difference; PROMIS‑PF=Patient‑Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (TGCT‑specific); TGCT=tenosynovial giant cell tumor.
ROMVIMZA reduced pain in nearly half of patients1,2
BPI worst pain response rate at week 25 was a prespecified key secondary endpoint in the MOTION study1,2,5
Patients were asked to rate their worst pain in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)
BPI responder: experienced at least a 30% decrease in mean BPI worst pain and did not experience a 30% or greater increase in narcotic analgesic use at week 25
BPI worst pain response rate at week 25 was a prespecified key secondary endpoint in the MOTION study1,2,5
Patients were asked to rate their worst pain in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)
BPI responder: experienced at least a 30% decrease in mean BPI worst pain and did not experience a 30% or greater increase in narcotic analgesic use at week 25
BPI=Brief Pain Inventory.
"Symptomatic benefit was not limited to patients who had objective responses per RECIST; patients receiving ROMVIMZA who had stable disease also had a meaningful improvement in active range of motion and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures."2
Gelderblom H, et al. Lancet. 2024.